General Medical Council

A representative for the General Medical Council, which brought the body of evidence against Squier, stated: “Mr Justice Mitting has affirmed that this case was not about logical level headed discussion and the rights and wrongs of the logical confirmation, however the way in which Dr Squier gave prove. HE648 HE744 HE840 HE699 HE795 HE891
HE649 HE745 HE841 HE700 HE796 HE892
HE650 HE746 HE842 HE701 HE797 HE893
HE651 HE747 HE843 HE702 HE798 HE894
HE652 HE748 HE844 HE703 HE799 HE895
HE653 HE749 HE845 HE704 HE800 HE896

“The decision clarifies that she acted unreliably in her part as a specialist witness on a few events, acted past her skill and needed objectivity, and looked to filter out research which it was clear did not bolster her suppositions.” HE654 HE750 HE846 HE705 HE801 HE897
HE655 HE751 HE847 HE706 HE802 HE898
HE656 HE752 HE848 HE707 HE803 HE899
HE657 HE753 HE849 HE708 HE804 HE900
HE658 HE754 HE850 HE709 HE805 HE901
HE659 HE755 HE851 HE710 HE806 HE902

Having heard entries on endorse, Mr Justice Mitting resolved to force conditions on Dr Squier’s enlistment intended to keep her giving master prove again in common, family or criminal courts in the UK, while enabling her to continue her non-therapeutic legitimate practice and still aid coroners’ courts. HE660 HE756 HE852 HE711 HE807 HE903
HE661 HE757 HE853 HE712 HE808 HE904
HE662 HE758 HE854 HE713 HE809 HE905
HE663 HE759 HE855 HE714 HE810 HE906
HE664 HE760 HE856 HE715 HE811 HE907
HE665 HE761 HE857 HE716 HE812 HE908
HE666 HE762 HE858 HE717 HE813 HE909HE667 HE763 HE859 HE718 HE814 HE910
HE668 HE764 HE860 HE719 HE815 HE911
HE669 HE765 HE861 HE918 HE915 HE912
HE670 HE766 HE862 HE919 HE916 HE913
HE671 HE767 HE863 HE920 HE917 HE914
HE672 HE768 HE864 HE921 HE923 HE922
HE673 HE769 HE865 HE674 HE770 HE866

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *